A social media feed is rarely a neutral window onto what is actually happening, since an algorithm sits between events and the viewer, selecting and ranking content based largely on what is likely to hold attention, which is not at all the same thing as what is most accurate or most important.
Content that provokes a strong emotional reaction tends to be amplified more readily than calm, measured reporting, simply because it generates more engagement, which means a feed optimised this way will systematically tilt toward alarm and outrage regardless of how representative that alarm actually is of the wider picture.
Understanding this does not require rejecting these platforms entirely, but it does mean treating a feed's apparent priorities with some scepticism, actively seeking out calmer, more measured sources deliberately rather than assuming that whatever appears most often is automatically the most significant thing currently happening. Over a long enough stretch, this kind of quiet consistency tends to outperform occasional bursts of intensity.