Survivorship bias describes the tendency to notice and remember the cases that made it through some filter, while the far larger number that did not simply disappear from view. News coverage of dramatic success stories, a single business that thrived, a single recovery against the odds, often suffers from exactly this distortion.
The stories that get told are, by definition, the ones with an interesting ending, which quietly skews a reader's sense of how common that ending actually is. A hundred quiet failures rarely make the news, while the one striking success gets covered repeatedly, creating an impression of odds far better than they really are.
Correcting for this means actively asking what the denominator looked like: how many attempts preceded this particular success, and what happened to the rest. That question does not diminish the story being told, but it does place it more accurately within the fuller picture it was quietly pulled from.